This may seem like an odd topic, but I couldn’t help but wonder after a YouTube video popped up in my feed, entitled “Wyatt Earp’s Nephew, Virgil Earp (Born in 1879), Talks About the Wild West“. There are two reasons why this is of interest to me. I just finished a two-part magazine series on the 1950s (in honor of the 1950 census release in April of this year). In the last issue I wrote extensively about one particular aspect of that far-reaching (and “fabulous”) decade: “Prime Time & Misdemeanors: The Rise and Fall of Television’s First Golden Age”.
The late 1940s through the late 1950s have been referred to as the first “Golden Age of Television”, a time when the airwaves were awash in a sea of game and quiz shows which aired morning, noon and night. Unlike radio, which had long provided audio entertainment to the masses, television was an audiovisual format – a way to not only hear, but see live events. Some shows, like College Bowl, Who Said That, Truth of Consequences and Queen for a Day, had been radio shows which later moved to television (or for a time aired on both formats).
The height of quiz show-mania occurred between 1955 and 1958, dominating the airwaves with shows like The $64,000 Question, The $64,000 Challenge, Dotto and Twenty-One, all of which offered the chance to win hundreds of dollars by answering “general knowledge” questions. However, the main purpose of these “get-rich-quick” shows was to enrich the network and show sponsors like Geritol, Colgate-Palmolive and Revlon. Revlon made a boat-load sponsoring The $64,000 Question — to the tune of a $64 million increase in sales — by the time the show (and others with similar formats) were cancelled by late 1958.
However, in early 1958 Virgil Edwin Earp, the son of Newton Jasper Earp (Wyatt’s half-brother), appeared on The $64,000 Question and his category was (surprise, surprise!) the Wild West. The episode which popped up on YouTube was the chance to double his previous winnings of $16,000 (to $32,000). Virgil was asked three multi-part questions related to the “Wild West” and he answered every one correctly and scheduled to appear again the following week where he would have the chance to win $64,000. It appears, however, that Virgil Earp, a self-proclaimed gambler, decided not to proceed to the next level, ending his streak at $32,000 in winnings.
In 1958 Virgil Earp was 79 years old and the last Earp of any fame. His father Newton and all his half-siblings (James, Virgil, Wyatt, Morgan, Warren and Adelia) had all passed on. It just so happens this particular Earp is related to me through my maternal grandmother (Okle Emma (Erp) Young). Even though my grandmother’s family (and a generation or two before her) changed the spelling of their name to “Erp” vs. “Earp”, we are related. According to Marc McDermott’s “Cousin Calculator” I (and all my first cousins on the Young side of the family) are related to Wyatt and his siblings, including Newton, as fourth cousins, three times removed. That would make Virgil Edwin Earp a fifth cousin, twice removed, and the ancestor we all share is Joshua Joseph Earp (1706-1771).
Not only did Virgil win $32,000, but he made a name for himself by regaling viewers and the studio audience with tales from the Old West. Mind you, the Earp family was still making headlines in the 1950s. Newspapers around the nation would, from time to time, feature articles about their legendary (factual and fictitious) escapades as lawmen and gunslingers. Before exploring answers to the two questions – did Virgil get the answers ahead of the show and was he really born in Tombstone – some Earp history is in order. . . .
The rest of what will be an extensive article on the Earps and the answer to these two questions will appear in the next issue of Digging History Magazine in “The Dash” column. Some of the stories will be familiar, but at least one incident involving Wyatt Earp is one which very few biographers mention. If you’d like to read the article (and the entire issue — see what’s brewing here), email me and I’ll send you a special link to purchase the upcoming issue for $3.99 ($2 off regular price) — [email protected].
I am trying to trace the parents of a Walter Raymond Earp Sr. Born about 1903, do you know his relationship to the famous Wyatt Earp?
Thanks
It’s likely they are, like I am, distant cousins. Are you actively researching on Ancestry of Family Search? If so, you should be able to locate Walter’s parentage and family line. If not, I offer research services with many convenient and affordable ways to pay.
https://digging-history.com/services/ (see the pricing section).
Either you entered info wrong in that cousin’s calculator, or you misread the results, or you don’t understand what “removed” refers to. If two people are first cousins, the child of one of them is still a first cousin of the older generation of cousins, but once removed, whereas another (non-sibling) child of those first cousins would be a second cousin of the first child mentioned here. When referring to your relationtionship to Wyatt & his siblings or half siblings, it is confusing they way you are refencing relationships, except to facilitate counting generatins between you and the “famous Earps” generation…common ancestors of yourself and those 4th cousins.. The point is that you and your first cousins are all blood relatives of the famous earps. That “Earp generation” would be parents, aunts or uncles of their own various children. Their various Great Great Grandchildren (…or GGG nieces or nephews) would be either siblings or fourth cousins of each other You and your first cousins, being 3 generations further descendant, are either 5 greats grandchildren (or 5 greats grand neices of nephews) of the famous generation, depending upon which of the famous Earps is being linked to. In fact, while you are first cousin to chilcren of your own aunts & uncles…in relation to ALL of the famous Earps descendents of the same generation…you are 7th cousins. Your common (same exact) ancestor is the father or mother of one or the other of the famous Earps…and YOUR 6 greats grandparent. If you draw a parallel set of lines & dots representing individual generations, but starting with a connection to a single person at the top, then label who they are relatied, first descending, then ascending the tree, its not all that complicated.