Re-Re-Writing History: The “Myth” of Helen Keller (just sayin’)

HelenKeller_AnneSullivanLast week I wrote about Laura Bridgman, who it turns out was the first deaf and blind person to be successfully educated, not Helen Keller.  What prompted that story actually had to do with a piece of Helen Keller history that came to my attention recently, and I wondered “why have I never heard about this?”

I would like to begin by saying I am not attempting to denigrate Helen Keller’s life and legacy or diminish her many accomplishments, but I was a bit shocked to learn these new facts about her.  You can take it for what its worth and make your own conclusions.  Read on.

Helen Keller, Socialist

By November 1912 her name and “socialism” had been in the news for awhile (and would continue to be for years to come).  She was told by friends that she had “shared the front pages with baseball, Mr. Roosevelt and the New York police scandal.”  She was happy that people were interested in her and teacher Anne Sullivan, who had married John Macy.  “Even notoriety may be turned to beneficent uses, and I rejoice if the disposition of the newspapers to record my activities results in bringing more often into their columns the word Socialism.”

At the time Keller wrote the piece for the New York Call, she had recently been offered a position on the Welfare Board of Schenectady, New York (a position she ultimately did not take, having never met the mayor who proposed it in the first place).  In September she was quoted: “I am a Socialist because only under socialism can every one obtain the right to work and be happy.” (The Evening World, 10 Sep 1912)

The_Evening_World_Tue__Sep_10__1912_In the Call she explained that she had become a socialist by reading.  The first book she read, New World for Old by H.G. Wells, was recommended by her teacher.  Keller was quick to point out that Mrs. Macy was not nor had ever been a socialist – she simply thought her student would find it of interest and stimulating.  Apparently Mr. Macy was an “enthusiastic Marxist propagandist”, as Keller referred to him, but his wife was not.

In the Call  (a Socialist newspaper, by the way), she further stated: “I am no worshiper of cloth of any color, but I love the red flag and what it symbolized to me and other Socialists.  I have a red flag hanging in my study.”  She referred to her fellow Socialists as “comrades”.

Keller was appreciative of newspapers and their efforts to help her promote her work with the blind, but when it came to their criticisms, her answer was “the money power behind the newspapers is against socialism, and the editors, obedient to the hand that feeds them, will to any length to put down socialist and undermine the influence of socialists.”  She was especially critical of the Brooklyn Eagle – “what an ungallant bird it is!”

She called the Eagle “socially blind and deaf” – part of a system that was happy to help publicize her social work, but wary of her disdain for capitalism.  Further, she declared that “The Eagle and I are at war.  I hate the system which it represents, apologizes for and upholds.”  If she ever decided to write a book in support of socialism, she would call it “Industrial Blindness and Social Deafness.”

Apparently she progressed to more radical causes, for in 1916 she wrote about why she joined the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), or the “Wobblies” as they were known.  The IWW, although categorically denying they were a Communist front, had always been opposed to capitalism.

Keller said that she “became an IWW because I found that the Socialist party was too slow.”  During the 1916 interview she was asked: “What are you committed to – education or revolution?”  Her answer: “Revolution . . . we can’t have education without revolution.  We have tried peace education for 1,900 years and it has failed.  Let us try revolution and see what it will do now.”

The_Oregon_Daily_Journal_Mon__Nov_25__1912_Helen Keller was willing to defend her beliefs no matter what.  Concluding the interview, she declared, “I feel like Joan of Arc at times.  My whole becomes uplifted.  I, too, hear the voices that say ‘Come,’ and I will follow, no matter what the cost, no matter what the trials I am placed under.  Jail, poverty, calumny – they matter not.”  Newspapers believed her socialist beliefs perhaps stemmed from the “manifest limitations of her development”.

Later she would protest the entrance of the United States into World War I.  Her protestations were rooted in her socialist (or communist) beliefs that workers would suffer and capitalism would triumph.  Some of her fellow protesters were arrested and imprisoned, yet Helen was never targeted.  She continued to write in support of her causes, however.

Oakland_Tribune_Sun__Sep_22__1912_Criticism of Keller and her beliefs escalated in the press, accusing those who surrounded her like Anne and John Macy of exploiting her.  As Helen Keller learned about these criticisms she staunchly defended her right to believe as she wished – and, as an American, right she was to defend them.  She had, in some ways, been exploited all her life and upheld as a virtuous, little blind and deaf girl who could do no wrong.  Her early accomplishments were exploited, and somewhat exaggerated, the “press” about her used to tout the school’s teaching methods.

Later her support of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) caused another stir, especially in her home state of Alabama.  But, again, because she was Helen Keller, the little deaf and blind girl in everyone’s mind, she sort of got away with a lot, including her most radical beliefs.

One paradox of her support for radical causes was that for a long time she had been a benefactor of one of the world’s most power capitalists, Andrew Mellon.  Still she believed that charity wasn’t necessarily the answer for those suffering from disabilities.  From that belief she worked tirelessly for the rights of the disabled.  She was keenly aware of her “celebrity” it seems, knowing that she could put forth her ideas, radical though they might have been, and “get away with it” in large part.

After Anne’s marriage broke up, she and Helen were offered the opportunity by Hollywood to make a movie about Helen’s life.  Helen thought it would give her an even wider audience to trumpet her socialist and radical beliefs.  It turned out to be a mistake, however, since the film was quite heavy-handed on sentimentality (think “maudlin”).  Helen Keller was portrayed at one point in the film on a white horse leading the charge to freedom.  As Hollywood tends to do, even in those days, they “spiced” her story up, adding a lover.  Helen later said that it was “too ludicrous for words.”

Her efforts for the American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) were greatly appreciated, but they were always uneasy about her politics.  The government sent her to Japan following World War II in hopes she would help heal the emotional damage inflicted by the war.  At the beginning of the Cold War and McCarthyism, the AFB was worried they too would be investigated.  The FBI had extensive files on Keller, several years-worth, and portions of those files are still redacted.

The_Ottawa_Journal_Sat__Oct_12__1912_I ran across an independent film while researching this story which does a good job of covering the “radical Helen Keller” – it even includes commentary from some of her great-great nieces and nephews in Alabama.  The reasons perhaps why I never heard about this side of Helen Keller were summed up in the introduction to the film:

Helen Keller (1880-1968) was world famous as the little deaf blind girl, the ‘miracle’ child who triumphed over adversity, an image later enshrined by Hollywood in the film The Miracle Worker.

But behind the image was a flesh-and-blood woman, writer and radical activist, suffragette and Socialist, under surveillance by the FBI and in constant struggle against the contradictions of her public image. She was a woman who lived to old age, yet is fixed in the public imagination as an eternal child.

You can watch that film (about fifty minutes in length) here.   The film provides more details and “enlightenment” regarding the life of this iconic American.  In a way, it’s a sad story because she couldn’t live up to the public’s perception of her life.  Even in death her wishes regarding her funeral (she wanted simple and intimate) were ignored – instead a large and elaborate service was held at Washington’s National Cathedral.

Again, my purpose in writing this article was not to diminish the life, legacy or accomplishments of Helen Keller.  However, sometimes when we know more about our so-called “heroes” our perceptions may require a little adjustment – just sayin’.

Have a GREAT day . . . someday it will be HISTORY!

SupportDH_sm2
© Sharon Hall (Digging History), 2014.

4 Comments

  1. Thanks. This is something I’d heard about but never had sources for.

    Reply
    • Great … there are tons of articles and web sites (marxist, socialist, etc.) who claim her as “one of their own”. If you have time be sure and watch the video — very good.

      Reply
  2. Hi Sharon,

    Thanks for a good article covering a little-known aspect of Helen Keller’s life. I enjoyed watching “The Real Helen Keller” at the link you provided.

    Another little-known aspect of Helen Keller’s life is that spiritually, she was an ardent Swedenborgian–which put her just as much outside the religious mainstream as she was outside of the political mainstream.

    She wrote a book called My Religion, which spoke of her spiritual views and her indebtedness to Emanuel Swedenborg for them. Unfortunately, it was not well edited, probably for the same reason her socialist views were shunted to the side: It didn’t promote the popular image of Keller as a saintly do-gooder with nary a radical thought. Some years ago it was re-edited into better form, and republished as Light In My Darkness–one of my all-time favorite books.

    Here’s the funny thing: Swedenborgians consider her a hero, but don’t want to acknowledge that she was a socialist. Socialists also consider her a hero, but don’t want to acknowledge that she was a Swedenborgian. The various deaf/blind institutions consider her a hero, but don’t want to acknowledge that she was either a socialist or a Swedenborgian.

    The reality is that Helen Keller didn’t fit into anyone’s box.

    I hope that one day she will receive the full respect she deserves for being a unique, strong-minded individual dedicated to the well-being of humankind even if that meant defying public opinion and the expectations it placed upon her.

    Reply
    • Thank you so much for the info .. that’s very interesting. Yes, I still believe, despite her political beliefs, she was an amazing woman — that’s the reason I said upfront my purpose wasn’t to denigrate her or her accomplishments in any way. Did you happen to read the article from the previous week about Laura Bridgman, entitled “Who Was First?”

      Thanks for stopping by my blog. I’m trying to build a larger audience and will have a site-redesign with a new dedicated web address outside of WordPress. If you’d like to follow the blog, please click the Follow button so I can notify you of the new site, etc. Like your blog too!

      Reply

Leave a Comment